This is the latest news about Criticism on Rishabh Pant. The risks that Rishabh Pant took during this Border-Gavaskar Trophy have drawn criticism; as a result, he received scores of 37, 1, 21, 28, 9, 28, and 30. Both inside and outside the Indian team, there is a perception that he fails to control his natural game when it is called for.
Pant showed that he could bat differently in Sydney, where Australia’s discipline on a pitch with bounce and seam movement caused him to absorb body blow after body blow. He entered the batting order as India was 57 for 2 after 25 overs, having lost a wicket on the final ball before lunch.
Batting differently than usual, Pant took them to tea for the loss of another wicket. After 50 overs, India was at 107 for 4. “I didn’t feel like taking control of the game during this innings because the wicket was exerting too much influence,” he said. “And the kind of situation we were in, I felt like I could play a little defensive cricket while I was playing inside. Yes, there is a time to attack, but you have to feel that from the inside.
I try to do whatever the game asks me to do on any given day, and that was my mindset, but I can’t just premeditate that I’m going to play this way.” Gautam Gambhir, the coach of India, had expressed the need for a team-first strategy after the loss in Melbourne, where each player must determine whether their natural style of play would advance or impede the team’s goals. Rohit Sharma had given Pant the task of determining what was best for the team and himself four days prior.
Pant expressed that prioritizing survival over stroke play is not particularly challenging. “Yes, the first part would be really challenging because, although you can hit a ball when it is in sight, there are instances when you need to play more sensible cricket, in my opinion. I could have taken a 50/50 chance early in this innings, but sometimes you have to play more secure cricket, especially with the way the [SCG] wicket was acting.
We knew that if we got another wicket here, we might lose two or three in a short period of time, so that was the mentality behind my play, and since there wasn’t much to do in the last match given the kind of target we had, I believe I had to play that [defensively], so I’m happy with the way I’m playing.
Read More About Criticism on Rishabh Pant
Pant doesn’t feel like giving up his gifts completely. “I believe that you primarily want to support your gaming style, but you must eventually continue to improve. I believe that there is no one right way to play cricket; the approach that comes more naturally is always preferred. However, you must strike a balance between playing aggressively and maintaining equilibrium when making all those shots, which is what I’m attempting to do.
My approach to playing cricket is to maximize every opportunity and maintain simplicity to avoid overthinking. You might overthink things when your tours aren’t going well.
The decision made by Rohit was made by management. Following a protracted period of poor performance and results, Pant India entered the Sydney Test with captain Rohit benched. “I think definitely it was an emotional decision,” Pant stated. “Because he’s been captain for a long time, we see him as a leader of the team, but I think there are some decisions with which you are not involved, and it’s a very management call, so I was not part of that conversation, so I can’t explain anything other than that.”
When Bumrah succeeded Rohit, he had a straightforward message for India. “I think mostly the message is like, Be positive all the time; don’t think about what has already happened; just give your best on the field,” Pant stated. “And that’s what you want from your captain: being in a positive frame of mind and keeping the game moving forward each and every day.”
When an on-field decision of not out was overturned in the final session and Washington Sundar was ultimately declared caught behind, India felt they had been on the wrong side of a DRS call. As the ball passed the glove, Snicko muttered something. Joel Wilson, the umpire, interpreted that as verification of contact. Yashasvi Jaiswal was caught behind in the last Test, and he undoubtedly hit the ball there, but Snicko did not support that claim. Pant believed that technology needed to improve.
“I think there is not much to say because technology is one part that, as a cricketer, you can’t control,” Pant stated. “But I feel whatever decision we make on the field has to stay with the on-field umpire. That’s the only thing, unless it’s so conclusive to change the decision. I think we should stay with the on-field umpire; the rest is the umpire’s decision. At the end of the day, I can’t challenge that every day, but technology can be a little better, I guess.”
Read Also: India vs Australia 5th Test: Thrills and High Stakes at SCG
Hi, I'm Tahir! I hold an MPhil in English Linguistics and have a deep passion for exploring and sharing ideas through writing. Currently, I’m focused on crafting engaging blog posts and thriving as a freelancer. With every word I write, I aim to inspire, inform, and connect with readers around the world. Thank you for visiting my blog—let’s embark on this journey of knowledge and creativity together!